Information overload
11 August 2009
Let’s face facts: our talent for generating vast amounts of random information far surpasses our ability to organise it. Maybe it’s time to declare information bankruptcy.
I'm trying to work out the exact moment when the amount of information in my life permanently exceeded my capacity to ever realistically deal with it.
It was probably some time in the 80s, when my discipline for cataloguing my cassette tapes slipped.
No long after, I got my first computer and the 3.5in floppy discs started filling up shoeboxes. Now, I have nine computers with a total of 12 terabytes of storage in internal hard drives, thumb drives, pocket drives, memory sticks, iPods, mini DVs, SD cards, MiniDiscs, VHS tapes, DVDs and CDs.
That's without even considering the filing cabinets stuffed with printed, flattened wood pulp and shelves full of half-read books, magazines and newsletters.
In January, I thought I would take two weeks to reorganise and rename everything in
My Documents in a New-Year's-resolution attempt to stem the relentless eruption of data enveloping my rapidly unravelling existence.
I found 200,000 files.
I got through the first three folders (all beginning with ‘A') before my two weeks was up.
I hadn't even started on my email file, with 20,000 email addresses submerged within, the 3000-plus websites I bookmarked, hoping to visit them again, or the instruction manuals for all the software I told myself I was going to master.
Evolution didn't really see this coming, otherwise we would have evolved brains that could instantly expand and reformat in response to this information explosion. We would all have elastic skulls and cells that could retain our lifestyle data as efficiently and accurately as they retain our DNA.
"Evolution didn't really see this coming, otherwise we would have evolved brains that could instantly expand and reformat in response to this information explosion."
The reality is, we are only marginally smarter than orang-utans.
While we haven't changed much biologically for many thousands of years, our networks, civilisations, institutions and technologies have overpowered our individual mind's capacity to cope. We are drowning in our own life-streams.
All this social networking hasn't helped.
No Flickr account is going to store every photograph I own.
No YouTube channel could ever collate, manage and stream the thousands of hours of video in my possession.
No Facebook page is going to organise and manage every person I have ever had anything to do with.
All these sites have done is added to my password collection and created more folders on my computer full of the files I wish I had the bandwidth to upload.
If I were a conspiracy theorist, I would deduce that social networking sites have been promoted precisely so as to increase my inability to do anything about anything, snowed under as I already was before I signed up.
How can I affect change in the world when I can't even get round to renaming DSC128769.jpg to something meaningful?
Maybe it's time to evolve in a different way, to a state of acceptance. Give up hope of ever sorting it out. Get ruthless and start deleting. Reduce the torrent to a gentle stream, make a nice little list of the things to sort out that will truly make a difference in my life and work on that. Let the rest just float on by.
It's cassette-cataloguing time!
RELATED ARTICLES
Comments:
Want to Post a Comment?
Register with NETT and you can download resource packs, comment on blogs and watch a podcast.Register Now










Loved the article and couldnt agree more. The irony was that I liked it so much that I saved it as a bookmark thinking I will definitely come back and read that agan ! Will we ever learn
Cheers. Richard
Oh every word you've written is SO true for so many of us nowadays. Why do we think we'll get back to something later? What makes us think we'll remember that one article above the hundreds of others we read?
How many files do I have in my Read it later folder, or sites in my Firefox folder - interesting sites to explore later ...?
But I've read Richard's comment - and I'm determined not to bookmark this article!
Cheers
Viv